On Pragmatic : Request-Refusal Strategy

Authors

Penulis : Norci Beeh; Editor : Seprianuas A. Nenotek, Piter Baun;

Keywords:

Pragmatic, Refusal Strategy

Synopsis

         The exchange of information and ideas among people is mainly done through language. The implementation is usually conveyed in both written and oral forms. To communicate in a written way, people must represent their ideas, wishes, and feelings by arranging the alphabet into words and sentences. In oral communication, on the other hand, people convey their ideas, wishes, and feelings by speaking directly to each other. Compared to the written form, the oral form is the most frequently used in daily human activities. Through communication, people send and receive messages effectively and negotiate the meaning.

         Language is the primary tool for communication, establishing peace and order in our society, showing authority and power, and attaining goals and objectives. But, it can also destroy society if used inappropriately by Susiati et al. (2019). The use of language includes the specific actions, behavior, or techniques that the speaker uses to convey the intended meaning or express the language itself. Those specific actions or expressions belong to the strategies in using the language. It must follow the society's conformity to avoid conflicts and meet the boundary of individual differences.

ISBN : 978-623-5431-11-6

Referensi:

  1. Amarien, N. 2011.  Interlanguage Pragmatics: A Study of the Refusal Strategies of the Indonesian Speakers Speaking English. TEFLIN Journal. Available on http://journal.teflin.org/index.php/teflin/article/view/178/66.
  2. Austin, J.1962. How to do things with words. Cambridge. Harvard University Press.
  3. Beebe et al. 1990. Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  4. Best, J.W. 1981. Research in Education. Fourth Edition. Prentice-Hall, Inc. London.
  5. Bin-Tahir, S. Z., Tenriawali, A. Y., Umanailo, M. C. B., Iye, R., Hasyim, M., Latjuba, A. Y., & Abbas, A. Designing English Teaching Model at the Remote Area Schools of Maluku in Covid-19 Pandemic Situation.
  6. Bloomer, A.et al. 2006. Introducing Language in Use. London: Routledge
  7. Brown, H. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Fourth Edition. London. Longman.
  8. Brown, H. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York. Pearson.
  9. Brown and Levinson. 1987. Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Cameron, D. 2001. Working with spoken discourse. London: Sage.
  11. Chen, H. 1995. Cross-Cultural Comparison of English and Chinese Metapragmatic in Refusal. Indiana University Press
  12. Cohen et al. 2007. Research Methods in Education. New York: Routledge.
  13. Dulay, H.B.1982. Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.
  14. Eryani, A. 2007. Refusal Strategies by Yemeni EFL Learners. The Asian EFL Journal. Volume 9, Number 2. Available on  http://www.asian-efl journal.com/June_2007_EBook_editions.pdf.
  15. Griffiths, P. 2006. An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics.Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
  16. Grice, H. 1999. Logic and conversation. London: Routledge.
  17. Guo, Y. 2012. Chinese and American Refusal Strategy: A Cross-Cultural Approach. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. Volume 2, Number 2. Available on http://ojs.academypublisher.com/index.php/tpls/article/view/tpls0202247256/4246.
  18. Harziko, Harziko, Yulis Mayanti, Karim Karim, Azwan Azwan, Musyawir Musyawir, and Risman Iye. "Penerapan Metode Variativ dalam Meningkatkan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Di Smp Buru." Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton 7, no. 1 (2021): 159-166.
  19. Hasani et al. 2011. A Comparative Study of Refusals: Gender Distinction and Social Status in Focus. The International Journal - Language Society and Culture URL: www.educ.utas.edu.au/users/tle/JOURNAL
  20. Holmes, Janet. 2001. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. UK: Longman Group
  21. Hornby, A.S. 1995. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. London: Oxford University Press.
  22. Jalilimehr, M. 2012. The Impact of Task Variation on Request and Refusal Speech Act Production in Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Comparative Literature and Culture (JCLC). Volume 1, No. 1. Available on www.worldsciencepublisher.org.
  23. Kartomiharjo, L. 1994. How to Say ‘no’ in East Java. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora & Sains.
  24. Lee, K. 2003. Exploring the relationship between language, culture, and identity. GEMA OnlineTM Journal of Language Studies, Volume 3 Number 23. Available on http://journalarticle.ukm.my/2762.
  25. Levinson, C.L. 1983. Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Marmaridou, S. 2000. Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
  27. Mey, J.L. 1993. Pragmatics. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  28. Meyerhoff, M. 2006. Introducing Sociolinguistics. London :Rutledge:
  29. Nolasco, R, and Arthur, L. 1987. Conversation. London: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Nunan, D.1992. Research Methods in Language Education Cambridge University Press
  31. Nunan, D. 1993. Introducing Discourse Analysis. London: The Penguin Group.
  32. Richards, K .2003. Qualitative Inquiry in TESOL.Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
  33. Rosita, E. 2012 The realization of the speech acts of refusal by the eighth graders of junior high school 2 Blora.Thesis. Semarang. English Language Education of Graduate Program of Semarang State University.
  34. Sattar, et al.2011. Refusal Strategies in English by Malay University Students. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies.  Volume 11 (3). Available on http://journalarticle.ukm.my/2762.
  35. Searle, J.R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  36. Sperber and Wilson., 1995. Relevance Communication and Cognition. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
  37. Susiati, S., Iye, R., & Suherman, L. O. A. (2019). Hot Potatoes Multimedia Applications in Evaluating Indonesian Learning In SMP Students in Buru District. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 2(4), 556-570.
  38. Tanck, S. 2002. Speech Act Sets of Refusal and Complaint: a Comparison of Native and Non-Native English Speakers’ Production
  39. Thomas, J. 1995. Meaning in Interaction: an Introduction to Pragmatics: England. Addison Wesley Longman Limited
  40. Thornbury, S and Slade, D. 2006. Conversation: From Description to Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  41. Transport, A. 1994. Interlanguage Pragmatics. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
  42. Umalle, J. 2010. Pragmatic Failure in refusal Strategies: British versus Omani Interlocutors. Arab World English Journal. Volume 2, Number 1. Available on www.awej.org/awejfiles/_32_8_3.
  43. Wardhaugh, R. 2006. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Fifth Edition. London. Blackwell Publishing.
  44. Wolfson, N. 1989. Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. London. Newbury House.
  45. Yule, G. 2001. The Study of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.

 

 

Forthcoming

9 July 2022